It felt like reading a long Wikipedia article. The were parts that were entertaining & educational. I wrote my own simplified list with the book as a base on 12 pages which should serve me well though. This book is much more about how to identify different types of rhetoric than it is about winning an argument and crushing your enemies. Basically all there is here is a laundry list of logical argument fallacies that are nonetheless commonly used and often accepted. The book is craftily built with real-life examples on how people managed, or failed, to "win an argument". I firmly believe that critical thinking is the single most important skill an undergraduate can obtain, regardless of major. Interesting Book. Each entry deals with one fallacy, explaining what the fallacy is, giving and analysing an example, outlining when/where/why the particular fallacy tends to occur and finally showing how you can perpetrate the fallacy on other people in order to win an argument. Gives a whole lexicon to describe exactly what's going on when you feel something's not quite right with an argument, along with som. Would not recommend, Fun book with a little history, a few contexts for argument (Twitter is given, but Medium or Facebook might have been interesting as long-form written social media in contrast to newspapers or magazines - a signpost to Kialo as a very logical and modern forum could have been worthwhile), and the main section is a glossary. Be the first to ask a question about How to Win Every Argument. It was okay. The distinctions between some of the fallacies are not clear. This is not what I expected. Without a doubt, one of the best was written by someone I knew in the old days. The back description of this book calls it "witty" and "infectious" but I wouldn't go so far to use those words. The attempts at humor are sometimes clever, but often just come off as the author acting superior. A straightforward and entry level discussion of the main logical fallacies that one may come across (will come across) in debate and more importantly perhaps, every day discourse. Its a nice read, not very interesting. You are taught what to believe, false rhetoric and inherited beliefs from when you are very young. The examples are very good and the advice on how to use each fallacy to your advantage quite humurous. Madsen Pirie managed to explain the different fallacies commonly found in arguments do the the soundness of the logic contained. This is the book your friends will wish you hadn't read, a witty and infectious guide to arguing successfully. Instead, you learn a little about how Cicero went at it. To see what your friends thought of this book. Very good source of information, and had some genuinely awesome insights. Think tanks are paid to churn out damage control options PR and image campaign consulting for large corporartions / politicians. Found interesting the ad lapidem part about boycotting speakers, which nowadays applies again to nazis on campuses, and the part about irrelevant humor. The book is an A-Z of fallacies people make while putting forward arguments listed by their Latin title. This is the book your friends will wish you hadn't read, a witty and infectious guide to arguing successfully. All in all though, most of the fallacies are pretty obvious and I didn't find the book particularly insightful. Unfortunately, as I read through it, it seems that Pirie doesn't quite have a great handle on some of the arguments he uses as examples in this book, which frankly puts the credibility of the rest of the book in severe doubt. It consists of a list of logical fallacies in alphabetical order, which can be admittedly a little dry. No mention about counter arguments. The relationship between fallacies is almost completely neglected (such as the relationship, or difference, between "slippery slope" and "runaway train" fallacies). I believe this work should be read before any other book - as soon as possible in life. The alphabetic organization works in making the fallacies easily accessible, but it does not help in clarifying the relationship between the fallacies which are expressed more in the back, but still not explained. This book gives a good description of all fallacies concerning logic. I believe this work should be read before any other book - as soon as possible in life. The examples and their accompanying punch line also well received: it brings enlightenment with a sense of good humor in it. Working with pure logic in electronics is one thing, but exploring linguistic logic further was entertaining. Mostly an expanded list of latin arguments interspersed with examples and snarky commentary by the author. The only real failing of the book is that you don't learn how to win an argument. A lot of different types of logical fallacies were explained, and they were really interesting.
Coconut Milk And Lemon For Hair Reviews, Child Psychologist Salary California, Unique Recipes Dessert, Stagg Acoustic-electric Mandolin, Tender Jackfruit Malayalam, Introducing Philosophy 11th Edition Table Of Contents, Alfred's Teach Yourself To Play Piano Pdf,